a
Highlights
- The question is changing, moving from what we lose to how we can reduce those losses
- Risk assessment is being done not at the underwriting stage, but much earlier
a
As climate volatility intensifies, insurers are moving beyond risk transfer to become strategic enablers of resilience, sustainable investment, and the low-carbon transition.
Climate change is no longer something to prepare for in the future. In 2025 alone, global economic losses from climate-related disasters crossed USD 162 billion in the first half of the year, nearly double the long-term average. Its impact is already visible in how economies function, how assets are valued, and how quickly disruptions unfold. Losses linked to climate events are rising, but more importantly, they are becoming harder to predict and absorb.
For decades, climate finance has asked one question: what does climate change cost us? The answers have been reflected in rising losses, damaged infrastructure, and disrupted livelihoods. But that structure is no longer sufficient. The question is changing, moving from what we lose to how we can reduce those losses. Insurers are now being asked not only how losses are covered, but how they can be better anticipated, reduced, and managed in a more structured way.
The Protection Gap in a Changing Climate Economy
A defining feature of today’s climate risk landscape is the gap between exposure and protection. Climate events are becoming more visible, more frequent, and more disruptive. But a large part of the loss they cause still remains uninsured.
This gap is not evenly distributed. In many emerging economies, where physical risks are often higher, insurance penetration continues to remain limited. When disruption occurs, recovery does not begin on equal footing.
In India, for instance, natural disasters led to uninsured losses of $32.94 billion between 2018 and 2022, with nearly 93% of exposures remaining uninsured.
The effects are not always immediate, but they build over time. Recovery slows. Access to credit tightens. Public systems carry more of the burden. These shifts shape how economies absorb shocks and how steadily they are able to rebuild.
Closing the protection gap, therefore, is not only about expanding insurance coverage. It is about ensuring that recovery itself is more consistent and more sustainable.
Insurance Is Moving Upstream
Insurance has always been about understanding and pricing risk. What is changing is where that understanding begins to matter. Risk is no longer being assessed only at the point of underwriting. It is increasingly being examined much earlier, as part of how assets, investments, and infrastructure decisions are shaped.
Climate risk is also being viewed differently. Instead of relying mainly on past events, it is now assessed across systems, assets, supply chains, and regions that are connected to each other. This makes it possible to see how exposure builds over time, how it shifts, and where vulnerabilities are likely to concentrate as conditions change.
This is also changing how decisions are made outside insurance. Risk thinking is increasingly feeding into investment planning, infrastructure design, and long-term capital allocation. At the same time, climate disclosure is becoming more structured, which is pushing organisations to define and communicate risk in a clearer and more consistent way.
Within this shift, insurance is moving closer to the front of the decision-making chain. Not just as a mechanism for paying claims, but as a way of making risk more visible, more structured, and easier to act on.
From Covering Risk to Reducing It
The shift from risk transfer to risk reduction is gradual but visible. Stronger building standards, early warning systems, climate-informed planning, and investment in adaptive infrastructure are becoming part of the broader response. These are not immediate fixes, but they influence how risk develops and how losses accumulate.
There is also a growing recognition of the link between coverage and resilience. The World Economic Forum notes that every one percent increase in property and casualty insurance penetration moves a country 5.8 percent closer to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
Over time, these elements begin to reinforce each other. Better risk data supports stronger planning. Greater coverage improves recovery. And more consistent prevention helps reduce the overall impact of disruption.
Enabling Capital for the Transition
The climate transition will depend on how steadily capital can move into long-term, complex assets. In India, reaching net zero by 2070 is estimated to require USD 10–20 trillion in investment, or roughly USD 250–450 billion each year. The scale is significant, but the challenge lies as much in the nature of these investments as in their size.
Projects across renewable energy, storage, hydrogen, and resilient infrastructure come with long payback periods and evolving risk profiles. Factors such as policy changes, technology maturity, and exposure to physical climate risks make them harder to evaluate using traditional frameworks. This uncertainty often slows down investment decisions, even when the need is clear.
Insurance helps bridge this gap by bringing structure to how these risks are understood and assessed. Through underwriting and modelling, it makes uncertainty more measurable, giving financial institutions greater confidence in how risks are priced and managed. In doing so, it supports the flow of capital into sectors that are critical to the transition, not by removing risk, but by making it clearer and more manageable.
An Industry in Transition Itself
The insurance industry is changing in tandem with the risks it is intended to control. Core operations like pricing, underwriting, and exposure management are also evolving as climate volatility rises. As risk behavior and loss patterns shift, assumptions that were historically stable over extended periods of time are now regularly reevaluated.
The emphasis is shifting from risk transfer to early intervention. With the help of more comprehensive data and developing climate models, there is an increased focus on prevention, resilience, and more ongoing risk assessment. Instead of merely reacting after losses happen, this enables insurers to deal with risk before it arises.
These changes are not consistent in all markets. Depending on their capital capability, regulatory frameworks, and risk levels, several areas are adapting. While some are actively redesigning portfolios to control volatility, others are still involved in higher-risk categories with more sophisticated pricing and modeling. When taken as a whole, these modifications show a larger, continuous reconfiguration in the way the sector is reacting to an increasingly unpredictable climate risk environment.
Looking Ahead
The transition to a climate-resilient economy is not shaped by a single factor. It unfolds through the interaction of policy, capital, infrastructure, and how risk is managed.
Within this, insurance is becoming more closely integrated. Not only as a way to cover loss, but as a way to understand risk and factor it into decisions over time. As climate risk becomes more embedded in financial systems, this role is likely to expand.
Neha Yadav, Head – International Business & Climate Risk, EDME Insurance Broker
